Comments on Methodology for Respondent Selection in AD Proceedings
SSA submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on its Proposed Methodology for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Proceedings in response to a Federal Register notice.
SSA fully supports the use of sampling to select mandatory respondents in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. Because the use of sampling facilitates the calculation of accurate dumping margins and enhances the remedial effect of the antidumping duty laws, the Department should begin to select mandatory respondents through a sampling methodology as a matter of course as soon as possible. Further, the Department should not permit the exceptions to employing sampling to swallow the general rule. The Department should also recognize and take steps to address the limitations inherent in data regarding “type 3” imports obtained from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”).
SSA concurs with the proposals set forth in the submission of the Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws in support of the use of sampling to select mandatory respondents.
Get news from Southern Shrimp Alliance straight to your inbox!
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
News
Comments on Methodology for Respondent Selection in AD Proceedings
SSA submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on its Proposed Methodology for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Proceedings in response to a Federal Register notice.
SSA fully supports the use of sampling to select mandatory respondents in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. Because the use of sampling facilitates the calculation of accurate dumping margins and enhances the remedial effect of the antidumping duty laws, the Department should begin to select mandatory respondents through a sampling methodology as a matter of course as soon as possible. Further, the Department should not permit the exceptions to employing sampling to swallow the general rule. The Department should also recognize and take steps to address the limitations inherent in data regarding “type 3” imports obtained from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”).
SSA concurs with the proposals set forth in the submission of the Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws in support of the use of sampling to select mandatory respondents.
Share This Article
Join the Mailing List
Get news from Southern Shrimp Alliance straight to your inbox!
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
Related Posts
Department of Labor Warns of Forced Labor in Indian Shrimp Industry
FDA Refuses Antibiotic Contaminated Shrimp from Two Indian BAP-Certified Processors; Cracks Down on Short-Weighted Shrimp from Three Indonesian BAP-Certified Processors
Unsolicited Wind Energy Proposal Could Harm Shrimpers
Enforcement of Section 609 Program Improving Foreign Commercial Fishery Practices
Southern Shrimp Alliance Welcomes Commerce’s Confirmation that Vietnam Remains a Non-market Economy
BAP-Certified Processor Has Shrimp Refused for Chloramphenicol; FDA On Pace for Most Refusals Since 2016